All other things being more or less equal, half of Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviewers found Symantec Endpoint Encryption to be difficult to deploy. Symantec Endpoint Encryption’s users are not impressed with the technical support that they provide.Ĭomparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Microsoft Bitlocker seems to be a superior solution. Service and Support: Users of Microsoft Bitlocker are divided over whether or not they provide adequate technical support.Half of Symantec Endpoint Encryption’s reviewers feel it is reasonably priced and half feel it is expensive. Pricing: Users of Microsoft Bitlocker feel that it is a pretty inexpensive product to use.However, they feel that the process by which upgrades are initiated could be smoother. Reviewers of Symantec Endpoint Encryption point out that its valuable features include its ease of use and its management capabilities. However, they feel that its graphical interface could be simplified. Additionally, they point out that it has other valuable features, including the ease with which one can initiate upgrades and its disk encryption capabilities. Features: Reviewers of both solutions note that they are both scalable and stable.Some users who note that the deployment is easy for them seem to indicate that the ease of deployment is related to their having previous experience deploying this type of product. Symantec Endpoint Encryption’s users are split down the middle when it comes to determining how easy it is for them to deploy. Ease of Deployment: Most users of Microsoft Bitlocker feel that it is an easy and straightforward product to deploy.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Microsoft Bitlocker and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on our users’ reviews in four categories.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |